How news aggregators might filter out discussion noise
Memeorandum and other news aggregators are focused on what’s going on NOW which isn’t really always super interesting. However, geek bloggers know that news aggregators are a great way to build traffic to their own blogs. A simple trackback post to the news item will likely result in publicity for the blog in the form of a link in the discussion for that news item on the aggregator’s site. Keen to this, many bloggers are quick to post such follow-ups. Sometimes the blogger adds some great insight to the news item in which case their presence in the discussion is certainly merited, but often it’s the case that the follow-up post is light on value to the reader and thus adds little to the discussion.
Gabe, if you’re somehow reading this, my suggestion would be to track out-going clicks such that if there is a link to a post in a discussion where many users are clicking and then within a few seconds clicking browser-back and returning to Memeorandum, then treat that as a negative importance vote for that link (post). If the post has a high-frequency of users that do click thru and quickly return to Memeorandum and also if the post has 0 comments, just go ahead and boot it from the discussion links for the news item. Hopefully that would encourage bloggers to only post follow-ups if they truly have something meaningful to add. Furthermore, it would help keep a high signal/noise ratio for Memeorandum readers.
In my own experience, I have noticed that the most insightful and mind-tingling posts are those where the author/blogger has clearly spent some time composing their thoughts and not just trying to garner some quick attention. For some good reads, I suggest you check out some of the blogs listed over on the right column under “Some Feeds I Read”. Happy reading!
Tags:aggregators, blogosphere, Memeorandum
WordPress database error: [Can't open file: 'wp_comments.MYI' (errno: 144)]
SELECT * FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = '55' AND comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date

