<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>It&#039;s Rishi &#187; Singularity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itsrishi.com/archives/tag/singularity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itsrishi.com</link>
	<description>Thought streams on the future of tech and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:13:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Raymond Kurzweil = modern day Nostradamus?</title>
		<link>http://www.itsrishi.com/archives/2005/12/02/raymond-kurzweil-modern-day-nostradamus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.itsrishi.com/archives/2005/12/02/raymond-kurzweil-modern-day-nostradamus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 09:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rishi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurzweil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singularity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsrishi.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About a month ago, I was watching an interview of Raymond Kurzweil on Charlie Rose.  I had heard of him before but, to be honest, did not know much about his background.  So, I searched my good pal Wikipedia and read about him.  Kurzweil wrote an essay back in 2001 titled, &#8220;The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About a month ago, I was watching an interview of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_Kurzweil">Raymond Kurzweil</a> on Charlie Rose.  I had heard of him before but, to be honest, did not know much about his background.  So, I searched my good pal Wikipedia and read about him.  Kurzweil wrote an essay back in 2001 titled, <a href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/articles/art0134.html?printable=1">&#8220;The Law of Accelerating Returns&#8221;</a> in which he theorizes about how continuing exponential growth of technology will soon (read: in many of our lifetimes) lead to The Singularity:</p>
<blockquote><p>It represents the nearly vertical phase of exponential growth where the rate of growth is so extreme that technology appears to be growing at infinite speed. Of course, from a mathematical perspective, there is no discontinuity, no rupture, and the growth rates remain finite, albeit extraordinarily large. But from our currently limited perspective, this imminent event appears to be an acute and abrupt break in the continuity of progress. However, I emphasize the word &#8220;currently,&#8221; because one of the salient implications of the Singularity will be a change in the nature of our ability to understand. In other words, we will become vastly smarter as we merge with our technology.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now I know that some of you are probably like &#8220;Wow, sounds like this Kurzweil guy&#8217;s been smoking a stash of some sweet chiba.  You think I could get some off him?&#8221;.   But what I really appreciate about the essay is  his scientific approach using empirical data from many areas of technology and methodical analysis to support his theories.</p>
<p>I can in no way do this paper justice by summarizing it.  I wanted to highlight some of the key points here but my list was getting too long and many of the points just don&#8217;t make sense out of context.</p>
<p>Like I said, I first read this paper about a month ago and ever since, I&#8217;ve mentioned it to almost everyone I know.  Even if you have absolutely no curiosity about the future of technology and how it will change your life, how can you <em>not</em> read an essay which begins by stating:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/articles/art0134.html?printable=1">&#8220;You will get $40 trillion just by reading this essay and understanding what it says.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>Over the next few weeks, I hope to read more from Kurzweil and other researchers to gain a broader perspective of this topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.itsrishi.com/archives/2005/12/02/raymond-kurzweil-modern-day-nostradamus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hydrogen cars = more gas consumption???</title>
		<link>http://www.itsrishi.com/archives/2005/12/01/hydrogen-cars-more-gas-consumption/</link>
		<comments>http://www.itsrishi.com/archives/2005/12/01/hydrogen-cars-more-gas-consumption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 11:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rishi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative-fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurzweil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singularity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsrishi.com/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, Patrick Bedard of Car &#038; Driver (my favorite automotive publication)   wrote a great article in which he crunched some numbers on what our country&#8217;s energy consumption would be if we all drove hydrogen-powered cars.  The underlying problem is producing hydrogen.  Because pure hydrogen does not exist naturally, it requires [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month, Patrick Bedard of Car &#038; Driver (my favorite automotive publication)  <a href="http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?section_id=27&#038;article_id=9978&#038;page_number=1"> wrote a great article</a> in which he crunched some numbers on what our country&#8217;s energy consumption would be if we all drove hydrogen-powered cars.  The underlying problem is producing hydrogen.  Because pure hydrogen does not exist naturally, it requires an input of energy to seperate hydrogen from a hydrogen-containing molecule (most often this molecule is water and the process is electrolysis).  So where does this energy input come from?</p>
<p><strong>Coal</strong> &#8211; Producing Hydrogen using coal is 12% efficient.  If all cars in the US were hydrogen powered, we would consume twice as much coal than we currently are with gasoline power.  We would also produce 2.7x carbon emissions.</p>
<p><strong>Natural Gas</strong> &#8211; The popular process for creating Hydrogen from natural gas is called &#8220;steam reforming&#8221; and is 30% efficient.  If all cars in the US ran on hydrogen created from natural gas, our gas consumption would actually increase 66% over current levels.</p>
<p>As depressing as it may be, the article offers clear evidence that hydrogen power cars are far from mainstream reality.  Until scientists can come up with a very efficient way to produce hydrogen, this technology just does not make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.itsrishi.com/archives/2005/12/01/hydrogen-cars-more-gas-consumption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
